On 28 November, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment that shook the country to its core. The court cancelled the bail of a man accused of poisoning his wife to death barely four months after marriage, and in doing so, it issued a moral and legal reprimand of rare sharpness. A bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and R Mahadevan stressed that ignoring the statutory presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act in dowry-death cases is an “unjust and distorted approach.” The judges made it unmistakably clear that dowry killing is not a personal family tragedy; it is a public crime, a blow to the collective conscience, and a direct assault on the very idea of humanity.
Read More





